Retrospective Analysis Study of Differences Between Bone Graft Types in Dentistry

Bone grafting is vital in modern dentistry, especially for enhancing implant stability in patients with bone deficiencies. In this work, a retrospective comparison is made the treatment outcomes of autografts, allografts, and xenografts applied in dental surgeries. Each graft type presents distinct biological and clinical properties influencing graft success, implant survival, marginal bone loss, and infection risk. The objective was to assess and analyze statistically these differences to aid clinicians in making informed decisions in graft material selection. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes associated with three types of bone grafts used in dentistry: autografts, allografts, and xenografts. Records from 150 patients were reviewed and analyzed to compare graft success rates, implant survival, marginal bone loss, and infection rates. The findings demonstrated that autografts yielded the most favorable outcomes, followed by allografts and xenografts, with notable differences confirmed by statistical analysis observed among the groups (p < 0.05). The study underscores the relevance of selecting appropriate graft materials based on patient-specifi