Evaluation of (Wet) and (Dry) Mediastinal Chest Drainage in Minimally Invasive and Conventional Cardiac Surgery

Background: Drainage of fluid and evacuation of air from the pericardial and pleural spaces after cardiothoracic surgery is necessary to prevent effusion, tamponade, and pneumothorax, and also to detect hemorrhage. For this purpose, negative-pressure drains are placed in the mediastinum and pleural cavities. We compared the efficacy and safety of two systems wet and dry drainage for the management and monitoring of negative pressure and anti-reflux valve safety systems, to promote healing of the pleural and pericardial cavities. Methods: Two devices for mediastinal chest drainage [Venice PAS (Wet) and Rome PAS (Dry); both Eurosets SRL, Medolla, Italy] were evaluated in terms of safety, efficacy and clinical outcomes in a cohort of 60 patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery procedures. The patients were divided into a minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) group [n=30; mitral valve surgery (MVS) by right anterolateral mini-thoracotomy] and a conventional cardiac surgery (CCS) group [n=30; coronary arterial bypass grafting (CABG) in full sternotomy] at a single institution (Anthea Hospital GVM Care & Research, Bari, Italy). Results: Negative pressure was managed with