Purpose: The growing integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into academic writing raises important questions about authorship, personal voice, and research integrity. This study examines how researchers perceive the impact of AI-assisted writing on authorial ambiguity, originality, and ethical responsibility in scholarly communication. Method: A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted using an online questionnaire distributed to individuals engaged in academic and professional writing. The instrument captured data on AI usage practices, perceptions of personal voice and authorship, and ethical attitudes toward AI-assisted writing. It also included classification tasks in which participants distinguished between human-written and AI-generated texts. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, while open-ended responses were examined through thematic analysis. Findings: Results indicate widespread use of AI tools for language support, including paraphrasing, explaining complex concepts, and grammar correction. Most participants believed generative AI can replicate human writing styles, contributing to authorial ambiguity, especially when us
📖 افتح في inklap 🔗 DOI 📮 اطلب بحثاً