Abstract Background Quarantine and isolation remain central public health measures during outbreaks, but their effectiveness and social consequences vary across diseases, jurisdictions, and implementation settings. Objective To examine how governance conditions shape the effectiveness, acceptability, and secondary harms of quarantine and isolation across historical and contemporary settings. Methods This structured narrative review synthesized historical scholarship, legal authorities, public health ethics literature, and selected epidemiologic and policy studies. Sources were identified iteratively and analyzed thematically. Results Across the reviewed literature, quarantine and isolation were most coherent when aligned with pathogen biology, grounded in a clear legal basis, implemented in workable settings, reassessed as evidence changed, and supported by equitable, non-stigmatizing communica
📖 افتح في inklap 🔗 DOI 📮 اطلب بحثاً