Background Digital workflows have revolutionized restorative dentistry, computer‐aided design and computer‐aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) milling, and three‐dimensional (3D) printing provide alternatives to conventional methods of fabrication of inlays, onlays, and veneers. However, comparative evidence of their clinical performance remains scattered. Aim This scoping review aimed to map and synthesize current evidence on the clinical outcomes of CAD/CAM– and 3D‐printed inlays, onlays, and veneers, focusing on adaptation, strength, esthetics, and workflow efficiency. Methodology This scoping review followed the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley, with refinements suggested by Levac et al., and was reported in accordance with the PRISMA‐ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies published f
📖 افتح في inklap 🔗 DOI 📮 اطلب بحثاً