ABSTRACT Objective Despite strong evidence supporting universal psychosocial risk screening in pediatric cancer implementation remains inconsistent. Factors at organizational, provider, and patient/family levels impact implementation. Potential differing perspectives regarding risk screening among multidisciplinary providers may influence uptake. This study describes perceived barriers and facilitators in implementing the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT), a psychosocial risk screener and examines differences by discipline. Methods One hundred seventeen healthcare providers (HCPs) representing medical, social work, and psychology from 18 pediatric cancer programs completed two scales from PAT Implementation Questionnaire (PIQ). Item scores (1–4 scale) were ranked and differences tested by discipline. Results Barriers were perceived as “minor” and facilitators as “significant” and overall PIQ scale scores did not differ by discipline. PIQ‐B had a s
📖 افتح في inklap 🔗 DOI 📮 اطلب بحثاً