Decisional capacity determination and serious mental illness in oncology: Implications for equitable and beneficent care

AbstractBackgroundPatients with Serious Mental Illness (SMI) have worse survival compared to cancer patients without SMI after controlling for delayed diagnosis. Decision‐making capacity (DMC) may be impaired in both populations (cancer or SMI). DMC may be further impaired based on coupled vulnerability factors that challenge Shared Decision Making (SDM) for patients with cancer and SMI.MethodsPsychiatric consultations for DMC in hospitalized patients with cancer (n = 97) were consecutively evaluated across a single institution cancer center. SMI data, demographic, and cancer‐related variables were obtained from the medical record. Descriptive data were contrasted in patients with and without DMC and used for logistic regression modeling.ResultsOverall, 42% had DMC with no significant differences based on SMI (χ2 = 2.60,p = 0.11). Patients with SMI were younger, receiving anticancer treatment, and were less likely facing end of life issues. Age (OR 1.03,p = 0.05) and no recent anticancer treatments (OR 0.34,p = 0.02) were associated with decisional incapacity. At 3 months post discharge, almost two‐thirds were dead with no difference based on SMI (χ2 = 0.01,p = 0.91). But End of Li